is there a year of drive train in the awd vans that is more robust? i want to get a second astro/safari awd for a desert mobile. maybe put a 305 or 307 in it nothing huge. maybe even a turbo charged 4 cyl..lol who knows
Through '98, they're all the BW4472 full-time AWD. From '99 up, it's the NP136 (same as the NP236 in '99+ automatic 4wd Blazers, etc but only single speed) automatic AWD case.
I like the '99+ simply because the van's in RWD until it detects slip, then automatically puts you in AWD.
Thats what you need. Having it in AWD all the time reduces MPG. Thats good because you can drive around in RWD until you need it, so your getting the MPG of a RWD van.
Thats what you need. Having it in AWD all the time reduces MPG. Thats good because you can drive around in RWD until you need it, so your getting the MPG of a RWD van.
The 99 and later vans don't get better mileage with the AWD deactivated, this is because all the associated with drivetrain parts rotate and create drag at all times.
Well, if there isn't too much of a difference between the AWD and RWD in terms of fuel mileage, then you should go for an AWD. They are a beast in the snow, and when driving in rain. They grip the road. The only time I ever got stuck with an AWD was when it bottoms out in the snow, and the tires are no longer touching the ground. Other than that, AWD has saved me a couple times, getting me out of the way of cars losing control in the snow.
Oh, if they are the same on gas.....then I would want an AWD too. Plus, for some reason, when I tell people my Astro van is 4X4, they never believe me, until I show them. Are they really that rare?
Most of the ones I have seen here in Maine are AWD, and for good reason. Though you might be confusing them by saying 4x4 because that is not the same as AWD.
I really prefer the full time AWD because it is what it says and you can count on it. On demand might be ok if the driver was the one demanding it instead of a computer that is only programed for a limited amount of happenings. For instance with full time awd if the back end loses traction in a corner you can roll on some throttle and the front wheels will pull you out of it BUT with on demand that may not be exactly what the computer is programed for and adding throttle is likely to spin you out as the front wheels didn't get the memo. You just have no way of knowing what to expect. Also as has been mentioned, all the components are still being driven either by the engine or by the rear wheels that of coarse are being driven by the engine. Same mileage shouldn't be a surprise imo.
we've seen quite a few noobs to A/S AWD in the winter think they had a problem with their on demand AWD's, but turned out it was working as designed. sometimes new and improved isn't as good as not fixing something that weren't broke in the first place.
we've seen quite a few noobs to A/S AWD in the winter think they had a problem with their on demand AWD's, but turned out it was working as designed. sometimes new and improved isn't as good as not fixing something that weren't broke in the first place.
I never use low range on the truck. But I just like being able to choose whether I use it or not. And when you do it isn't playing. If I had a AWD van I would do what was needed to have that.
i would like to do the pushbutton 4wd mod on mine eventually, maybe
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Chevy Astro and GMC Safari Forum
438.3K posts
23.2K members
Since 2008
A forum community dedicated to Chevy Astro and GMC Safari owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!