chevymaher said:
And I agree with most of what you have said. My issues are when they are designed in a way to prevent tampering. When modifications are not cost effective. Or maintenance becomes outlandishly expensive. Or incredibly hard because of said tech. I got skills to fix it. But if it harder than old tech, with minimum benefits, it garbage to me.
The tech should make my life easier not harder. Or cost me an arm and a leg.
I have a free mind and don't like to be told what to do. And live where governmental controls and mind games are minimized. So I have the freedom to do what I want. And government black boxes designed in such a way to prevent me from meeting my goals are not welcome. I use them till they fail, gut them and use what is user friendly.
I can agree ,, but there are things to understand that go along with that
there are citizen action groups that demand that government do something about pollution so , then the government demands auto makers to design a system that will burn fuel more efficiently producing less pollution ,,, but then the consumer still does not want to take care of their car , so it comes back to the owner to do preventive care to help the system last longer ,, but if a person does not care ,,....
For the most part the negativity being espoused here is not about technology in the sense of someone designing a product that is useful and innovative but rather it is what is called
Planned Obsolescence ,,,it is taking technology and intent fully abuse it for profit making ,,,
http://owni.eu/2011/05/09/planned-obsol ... nsumption/
company's like Apple who do not want their systems upgradable by the consumer . but instead only upgradable by Apple if the consumer wants to keep the warranty intact ,
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-ne ... -obsolesce
or the companies that require you to buy their own propitiatory brand of ink to work in their products to force you to pay them profit ....
There are crooked auto repair techs that want more of a customers money so they add to the bill ,,known as padding the bill with things that are not needed in order to make the bill more costly.
People in America became more focused on low level entry pricing of a product without knowing the quality of a product ,, so then you have a company that says they will warranty their product for 5 years , but their cost is considerably higher than the competition who only has a 1 year warranty , so the consumer thinks they should buy the cheaper price product and buy more often than to buy the Made in USA quality product , then the manufacturer has to become more competitive so they either start using lower quality materials , and or move their company overseas where labor costs are much much lower ,,
but that is what happens when people only want to spend just enough to get by on,,..., they get a product that used to last 3 times as long. But now for a cheaper price they have to by more often ,, then get upset that the product does not last as long ,
Consider you being a company that makes a product and you warranty it free replacement for several years ,, then you start getting hundreds of units in return on warranty that did not need repair but was sent in by consumer who did not understand the product , did not have the knowledge to work on it and is responsible for damaging the unit simply cause they did not know how to operate it ,,,, are you willing to incur the cost of replacement of each unit because some consumer opened it up the screwed it up ? No you will not want to do that so you will want to take some measure that says that if you open it up then you VOID the warranty because the consumer did not posses the skill needed , the OBD systems on cars is very good ,, it is designed to be helpful to the Trained & educated technician to diagnose the problem simpler and faster ,, but the tech has to be trained on how the system is designed and how to use it effectively ,,
most governments now require it and for it to be in good working order ,, if it is gutted and replaced with old technology it will be the responsibility of the new owner to replace the old with the new in order for it to be legal ..which will cost more than the car is worth , so if you buy a car that has been changed like that you have thrown away your money .....just something that you have to accept , some people live in a state where emission checking is not done , but if they decide to move to a state where it is done they will nee to sell that car before they move or spend money to get it repaired
chevymaher said:
There are always 2 sides to every coin. I like what works the best. Cheapest and last longest. Even if I must endure taunts.
Yes there are 2 sides
Consider the technology that is used to make cigarettes , a product that has NO value at all , nothing good about them , and even though the public has been shown that cig makers chemically treat tobacco to cause . induce , create cravings to smoke and know full well that they cause physical damage to the body of smoker ,, the smoker still will spend several $1000's of dollars every year of their life for a product that destroys their health , but yet scowl at the idea of spending a mere $70 for a product that has useful purposes
all I have done is try to bring attention to a technology that is growing very fast and will in short time will be so popular that using a conventional mouse and keyboard will not be needed
Microsoft has used something similar , but not nearly as fast or as accurate , but now because several other companies can see the great potential for a product like this and how they can implement it in just about every type situation ,, when the rest of the population sees it , experiences and sees it has great usefulness then the market will become saturated by a product that brings complete interaction with computers , Microsoft will buy out this company if the company will be open to that idea , as buying out companies to own the product is what MS does ,, they have bought many software companies and rename the product to Microsoft ,, they bought Skpe ,, and are now trying to buy Yammer business social media , recognized as the Facebook of the business world
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/business/tec ... rkplace-1b
here is a video of yet another company that makes a product much like the Leap ,, to show that there are more companies that want a piece of the Interactive PC world that is coming very soon , you will likely see more brand names of a product like this coming in the near future and it will become the same price as your typical mouse .
This one is called G-speak
It may not be as fast as the Leap but surely the company will continue to work on it until it gets all the oohs & ahhs they hope for ,, the point is that this type of technology is what is coning very very soon and will be perfected
This technology will become mainstream in a variety of products
Here is even something more advanced that they expect to reach the market in about 2-3 years ,, it use your eyes to control what you do on a computer , interactivity using your eyes
http://techocular.wordpress.com/2011/03 ... with-eyes/