Chevy Astro and GMC Safari Forum banner
21 - 29 of 29 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
269 Posts
Discussion Starter · #21 ·
Here's a new one...
340-HP 3.6-Liter Four-Cylinder LS-Headed Crate Engine

"In an industrial application, this small package, at only 1,800 rpm, will put out diesel-like torque numbers. If configured for a performance application, this bore and stroke combination could produce well over 300 horsepower and nearly 500 lb-ft of torque!"



Blueprint’s New LS-Headed Four-Cylinder Crate Engine Prototype
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
7,728 Posts
I believe there is, I once saw a writeup somewhere on a 4.3 swapped into a Fiero. The adapter may have been a one off though, I don't remember. It's been a long time since I saw it.
 

· Registered
1992 Astro - Silver / Gray / 4 Wheels
Joined
·
6,157 Posts
opelbits said:
... 340-HP 3.6-Liter Four-Cylinder LS-Headed Crate Engine - By Blueprint
The guy said this is a perfect candidate for Turbo or NO Shot.
Seems the smaller block would give more room in the cramped eng. comp.

Anyone find out what that one would cost...?
Got to be in the 5 figures.


So... is it ok to speak of oddball V8s ?
How bout 2 V8s - seen them, too.

Seems "Hopping Up the V6 Engine" is the most economical and practical difference maker.

I saw a screamer crate 4.3 for around $2300 - it was the cheapest motor the company sold.
Remember, w/ those exotic motors as outlined in this thread, there are the elecs. and the electronics.

Plus, the mechanical - people can't hardly find decent mechs. that want to fiddle w/ the STOCK M/L class Vans.
I am not sure where in our Greater Cinti. area where I would get our 4.3 rebuilt semi-professionally.
That is if I needed it...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
269 Posts
Discussion Starter · #26 ·
I just ran across the 3.6 article. I'm sure it would be pricey. What makes it interesting is that even though the current generation narrow angle GM v6 is a powerhouse compared to the 54* and 60* v6's of just 15 years ago, this 4 cyl industrial motor is capable of more power than many of the old 'musclecars' that are so revered.

Talk about whatever you want, it's my thread and I see no reason to limit the discussion. I like oddball and nothing struck me as more oddball than a 4 cyl (normally a reason to NEED a swap) that makes as much or more power as the V6 it could replace.

Not sure practicality is a good criteria for most non-stock motor swaps, some just go easier than others. And none of these are really good options if changing out a stock motor is going to be a struggle. The 3.6 will require some headscratching. Since it's not a car motor, it may be easier to convert to carb than even an LS type V8, but without more info...?
The 3.7 boat motor, on the other hand, has a few issues (bellhousing is not exactly a straight bolt up but it's minor, adapting a regular alternator, dropping compression, etc.) but is already a carb motor (4v quadrajet) and the distributor is related to the 4 cyl from the Chevy ll, I think. Still, it requires work to fit it.

Hotrodding the 4.3 is, as you say, the most economical. With fitting in a same year V8 with stock style TBI (or CPI?) being the next cheapest and practical. I think MMusicmans carbed V8 might cost a little more due to buying a new 4v/headers/HEI.

As for finding a mechanic, most seem to want easy repair work. That doesn't seem to include 20-30 year old crusty vans with brittle plastic. Geez, the last mechanic I went to with the van, just to mount tires I bought, they damaged my rockers with the two post lift.
A rebuild shop, if the 4.3 is beyond them, why would you trust them with anything?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
712 Posts
The only 4 banger I ever played with was back in the 80's. I had a 76 Chevette that I pulled the stock 1.6 4 speed and dropped in a 2.3 Vega engine with a progressive 2 barrel carb and 4 speed. It smoked Baja Bugs. 😃
 
21 - 29 of 29 Posts
Top