Chevy Astro and GMC Safari Forum banner

ceramic brake pads and towing

3 reading
5.5K views 16 replies 9 participants last post by  kennysmoke  
#1 ·
To make a long story short I replaced the brake pads on my van today. After installing them I noticed they don't have the same initial bite as the old pads did. So I look up the part number on the box and apparently advance auto gave me ceramic pads instead of semi metallic. I run ceramics on my cars and suv's but have never ran them on a truck . I looked online and most places say not to run ceramics for towing because they don't have the same high heat tolerance or fade Resistance as semi metallic pads do when used for towing. So has anyone ever used ceramic pads for towing? Or should I just exchange them for semi metallic ? I will be doing a lot of towing our 2000lb pop up camper this spring so wanted some input. Oh and one more thing I noticed my new ceramic pads smelled like they got very hot on my way home from work. My old semi metallic never got that way unless going down a steep long hill. Could it be the wear ever gold ceramic pads just aren't quite up to the task of stopping my heavy Astro ? If they are getting too hot driving normal no way are they up to the task of towing. I think I may have just answered my own question. :confused:

Tim
 
#2 ·
Also has anyone tried Wagner severe duty semi-metallic pads ? Wagner says they far exceed the minimum specs for police and fleet vehicles .
 
#4 ·
Is the dust from them any worst than normal semi metallic pads? and does it easily clean off?

thanks
 
#5 ·
Ceramic pads are lower dusting than semi-metallic and not as icky to clean up. I have them on my Jeep Liberty - ceramic pads are OEM and I replaced them with aftermarket ceramics.
 
#6 ·
The easy to clean tan dust they produce is the main reason I run them. What bothers me is I plan on taking a trip with the van loaded down and pulling a camper in the hills of tennessee sometime this year. And alot of brake pad manufactures do not recommend ceramic for towing. unfortunately my camper doesnt have brakes. It is under the weight brakes would have been required by law. I may just end up spending the $200 or so and add brakes to it before the trip.
 
#8 ·
Coincidentally, I just put a set of Wearever (Advance Auto) Platinum Professional Ceramic Brake Pads on my 92 Astro this past weekend (along with new rotors and calipers too). Normally $49/set, I got them for $34/set after a big online discount. I just noticed they are now offering a $40 rebate as well!
http://shop.advanceautoparts.com/p/carq ... 10143726-P

They do seem to be less "grippy" than my previous semi-metalic pads... but I assume they may still be "breaking in" (no pun intended). I think I read somewhere that they may work best when they get heated up. They may not be ideal for frozen conditions though... not sure. But then again how fast can you stop on snow or ice anyway!

Ceramic pads meet or exceed all original equipment standards for durability, stopping distance and noise. According to durability tests, ceramic compounds extend brake life compared to most other semi-metallic and organic materials and outlast other premium pad materials by a significant margin - with no sacrifice in noise control, pad life or braking performance.
Semi-metalic pads may simply excel in "typical" stopping power (for heavier vehicles), but with plenty of trade-offs too.

I'm not towing or hauling a lot of weight... so I figured I'd give them a try. This is my first set. I don't live in the mountains or drive the Autobahn, so I think I'll be fine. Many car companies are using them OEM now... so that sounded good enough to me.

The new braking system is as smooth as glass!

I guess there are always certain trade-offs! I'm hoping to get some good life out of these.
We'll see!

------------------------------------------

Here's what one site said about "The Benefits of Ceramic Brake Pads"
http://www.autoanything.com/brakes/pros ... rakes.aspx

"Besides being quieter, ceramic brake pads handle extremely high temperatures with little fade, allowing them to recover quickly and cause less damage to the rotors. Also, when ceramic brake pads wear down, they create a finer, lighter dust than semi-metallic pads, and the dust doesn't stick to wheels. Finally, studies have found that ceramic brake pads have a longer life span without ever sacrificing noise control, rotor life or braking performance.

One con of ceramic brake pads is the cost. Ceramic brake pads tend to be more expensive than semi-metallic pads. Also, ceramic pads aren't suitable for all vehicles (stopping power), so always be sure to check your owner's manual before making a purchase."
----------------------------------------

It depends on who you ask as to some of the pros and cons:
http://lamartinaporsche.over-blog.com/a ... 57226.html
 
#9 ·
Ceramics- Pros less dusty, better faded, less noise, all around the better package Cons- There pricey depending on vehicle options.
Semi-Metallic- Pros- they stop the car, mostly the standard brake pad for vehicles. Cons- Noisy when they get hot. brake dust.

The ceramic would have been the better option but since your towing something that no brakes on it. The stopping distances would have to increase because of the added weight the vehicle needs to stop. Best bet go with heavy duty semi metallic or heavy duty ceramics and upgrading the brake fluid to DOT 4. For better higher temperature.
 
#10 ·
The rule of thumb I was taught is simple... if it aint got ceramic from the factory, don't use ceramic.
Semi-Mets work just fine. Astro brakes are a wee skeezy to begin with until 2003 if memory serves. My '03 stops waaaay better than the '99 ever pretended to, and I replaced damn near everything on those brakes (less hydraulics) with no measurable improvement.
Image
 
#11 ·
Wimpazz said:
Astro brakes are a wee skeezy to begin with until 2003 if memory serves
Are you sure about that? My brakes were great before I installed the ceramic pads. It used to slam you to the dash with pressing the pedal just 1 1/2 inches. That's the main reason I bought my van. They seem to be getting a little better after 3 days of stop and go driving in heavy traffic. I have never had ceramic pads take that long to break in but I guess it's possible. I guess I will just run them untill I get ready to take my camping trip then I will switch to the severe duty semi met. pads.
 
#14 ·
Well, skeezy (or Sphleazy/ Striggly) brakes are all relative terms I suppose, depends on your point of view. My '99 van stopped a lot like my '92 Wrangler, which is not world renowned for its WOE (or it's GO). I tried both in the Jeep (lighter, smaller) starting with ceramic, but didn't like the fade, so went back to Semi-mets.
My '03 van is like you described about, 1/2" of pedal and you launch through the windshield. I know GM did an upgrade in '03-ish to the brakes when they went to the 6 lug.

Hell, at the end of the day, what matters is if you're happy with what you got. If not, change it.

Lumpy- Isn't brake Frop a simple function of weight to left-handed blinker fluid ratio?
 
#17 ·
timothy47130 said:
Wimpazz said:
Astro brakes are a wee skeezy to begin with until 2003 if memory serves
Are you sure about that? My brakes were great before I installed the ceramic pads. It used to slam you to the dash with pressing the pedal just 1 1/2 inches. That's the main reason I bought my van. They seem to be getting a little better after 3 days of stop and go driving in heavy traffic. I have never had ceramic pads take that long to break in but I guess it's possible. I guess I will just run them untill I get ready to take my camping trip then I will switch to the severe duty semi met. pads.
I have an '03 Astro AWD and a '01 Safari AWD and there is no comparing the two systems when the '03 is functioning properly... the '03 brakes are far superior.